Novell/Microsoft invent the 'Hobbyist', forget what 'Community' means

    richard dale's picture
    2006
    6
    Nov

    The recent Novell/Microsoft agreement purports to give what they call 'Non-Compensated Individual Hobbyist Developers' the rights to use unspecified Microsoft patents. The terms are given in this Community Commitments - Microsoft & Novell Interoperability Collaboration. They define a 'hobbyist' as this:

    Many software developers, often referred to as “hobbyists,

    Comments

    Comment viewing options

    Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
    quintesse's picture

    Besides the fact of course

    Besides the fact of course that a lot of those so-called hobbyists are actually professionals who just think that their time is best spent working on some cool little software project instead of laying on the couch watching TV.

    And also forgetting the fact that this is one of those fields of technology where "hobbyists" regularly outperform those highly paid professionals.

    So IMHO the tone of this text is more than a little condescending.

    jaroslaw staniek's picture

    MS Equation: FOSS == Freeware (non-commercial use)

    `Get the Facts' telenovela continued (?) ;)

    krake's picture

    Not even freeware

    This wouldn't help freeware either, because a developer could still be paid for working on said freeware.

    Microsoft itself pays developers to work on freeware, e.g Internet Explorer, so they definitely considered this

    pipitas's picture

    It's half a laughable joke, and half a deception

    Microsoft offers to not sue you for potential patent infringements that occurred "for Your personal creation of an originally authored work (“Original Work

    richard dale's picture

    Re: It's half a laughable joke, and half a deception

    Yes, to paraphrase Eric Raymond:

    Given enough eyeballs, all deceptions are shallow.

    krake's picture

    Calls for a new campaign

    We'll see a joint FSF/EFF campaign soon: "deceptive by design" :)

    zander's picture

    And add to that...

    In the EU patents and any other IP laws can not influence what I do in the privacy of my own home. So I infringe all patents I want and if I don't actually share the code, its all legal.

    Which makes the commitment a null-statement. They give you what you already have every right on.

    Sounds like a marketing ploy (to avoid the word FUD) along the lines of: "Here is a license that allows you to eat your dinner tonight, aren't we nice guys"?

    Also see this cartoon: getFuzzy

    krake's picture

    Might not even be restricted to one's home

    In an interview on a radio show for Austrian's main radio station a patent specialist from the Autrian patent office said that non-commercial use of patents is always legal in Austria.

    He also didn't get that neither open source nor free software or their creators are implicitly non-commercial.

    Comment viewing options

    Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.